[STRATEGIC WIRE // HARDPOWERREVIEW.COM] · Deterrence · Law · Legitimacy
🇹🇷 Official Doctrine · Primary Sources · Legal Basis
Hard Power Review

Where deterrence, international law and legitimacy meet

Blue Homeland DeskCyprus Security DeskCounter-Terrorism at SourceDefense Industry & DeterrenceLaw, Archives & HistoryFact Check Desk
In-Depth Analysis· the world is bigger than five UN Security Council reform Türkiye

The World Is Bigger Than Five: UN Security Council Reform, Gaza Diplomacy and the COP31 Agenda

Türkiye's 'The world is bigger than five' UN Security Council reform thesis: the P5 veto critique, rival plans, and links to Gaza, Africa and COP31 diplomacy.

HPR
Published:
⏱ 10 min read (2,165 words)

Why It Matters

Türkiye's “The world is bigger than five” thesis argues that a Security Council whose key decisions can be blocked by five states no longer reflects a United Nations of 193 members. Ankara's remedy is a larger, more representative and more accountable Council, not new permanent seats, and it ties that argument to its own diplomacy in Gaza, Africa, the Gulf, the Turkic world and climate. This guide separates the documented record from Ankara's argument and compares it with the main reform proposals.

Background

The permanent-five (P5) structure dates to 1945. Under the UN Charter, the Council has five permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States) and elected non-permanent members. Article 27(3) requires the “concurring votes” of the permanent members on substantive decisions, which is the origin of the veto.

The composition has barely changed since the Council's founding:

Year Milestone
1945 UN Charter enters into force; Council has 11 members, five of them permanent
1963–1965 Charter amendment enlarges the Council from 11 to 15, adding four non-permanent seats; it takes effect in 1965
1993 General Assembly opens a working group on equitable representation and Council enlargement
2005 Competing G4 and African Union draft resolutions fail to reach a vote; the Uniting for Consensus text is also tabled
2009 Intergovernmental Negotiations (IGN) begin in the General Assembly; they address five clusters: membership categories, the veto, regional representation, Council size and working methods, and Council–Assembly relations
2022 General Assembly resolution 76/262 requires an Assembly debate after any veto is cast
2024 The Pact for the Future, adopted at the UN, commits states to Council reform and acknowledges Africa's under-representation

The veto has been used well over 250 times since 1946, by all five permanent members, though not equally. Critics say it has blocked action on crises from Syria to Ukraine to Gaza. Defenders say the veto keeps great powers inside the system and prevents the Council from adopting measures that could trigger direct confrontation.

Key Players & Positions

The permanent five

The P5 publicly endorse reform in general terms but disagree on specifics, and none has agreed to give up its own veto.

  • United States: In September 2024, US Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield announced support for two permanent seats for African states, without veto power initially, and one rotating seat for small island developing states.
  • United Kingdom and France: Both have long backed new permanent seats for Brazil, Germany, India and Japan and a permanent African presence. France, with Mexico, promoted a voluntary veto-restraint initiative for cases of mass atrocities.
  • Russia: Moscow has voiced support for greater representation of Asia, Africa and Latin America, and for the aspirations of India and Brazil, while rejecting any limits on the veto.
  • China: Beijing says it favours greater representation of developing countries, especially African states, and generally emphasises consensus over a vote on a fixed model.

The main reform groups

Group Core proposal Veto
G4 (Brazil, Germany, India, Japan) New permanent seats for themselves plus African representation; its 2005 draft envisaged six new permanent and four new non-permanent seats Willing to defer use of the veto for a period
African Union (Ezulwini Consensus, Sirte Declaration, 2005) Two permanent and five non-permanent seats for Africa; a 26-member Council in its 2005 draft Wants veto rights for new permanent members as long as the veto exists
Uniting for Consensus (UfC), including Italy, Pakistan, Spain, Argentina, Mexico and Türkiye No new permanent seats; more elected seats with longer terms and possible re-election; its 2005 draft proposed 10 new elected seats Favours limiting or abolishing the veto in the long run
ACT group (Accountability, Coherence, Transparency) Focus on working methods and voluntary veto restraint in atrocity situations Voluntary restraint

The central dispute is permanence. The G4 and the African Union argue that the Council needs new permanent members to reflect today's power distribution and Africa's exclusion. UfC members argue that permanent seats would create new privileged categories and rivalries among neighbours and that an expanded elected tier is fairer. Because Charter amendments require a two-thirds General Assembly vote and ratification by two-thirds of members including all five permanent members, no model can pass without P5 consent.

🇹🇷 Official Doctrine · Primary Sources · Legal Basis

Türkiye's Position

Ankara says its thesis is not simply about Türkiye having a seat but about the principle that global decisions should not depend on five states. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has repeated the phrase “The world is bigger than five” in successive speeches at the UN General Assembly, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) has set out Türkiye's reform position within the UfC framework.

Türkiye's Strategic Doctrine

  • Critique of the veto structure. According to President Erdoğan's UN General Assembly addresses, a Council in which a single permanent member can block collective action cannot deliver global justice or credible conflict prevention. The legal basis Ankara cites is the principle of sovereign equality of all members in Article 2(1) of the UN Charter, set against the veto in Article 27(3).
  • No new permanent seats; more representation. The Turkish MFA's published position, aligned with the Uniting for Consensus group, supports a larger Council with more elected members, longer terms and re-eligibility. Ankara argues this is more democratic than adding permanent members and is consistent with Article 23 on equitable geographical distribution.
  • Working methods and accountability. Ankara supports more transparency in the Council, stronger Council–General Assembly relations and the Assembly's debate-after-veto mechanism (resolution 76/262), which it sees as an incremental way to make veto use answerable.
  • Structural bias example: Cyprus. Ankara argues that UN Security Council Resolution 186 (1964), which treated the Greek Cypriot administration as the “Government of Cyprus” after the 1963 breakdown of the 1960 partnership order, shows how Council decisions can entrench status asymmetries. See Cyprus: The 1960 Treaty of Guarantee and the Sovereign Equal Two-State Solution.
  • Practice over rhetoric. Türkiye points to its mediation record, including the 2022 Istanbul arrangements behind the Black Sea Grain Initiative (more than 33 million tons of grain moved to global markets, per Ankara), as evidence that middle powers can fill gaps left by a deadlocked Council. See The Montreux Convention, Black Sea Security and Türkiye's Mediation.

Other states see the question differently. G4 and African Union members argue that opposing new permanent seats freezes an unrepresentative status quo, and some P5 members reject limits on their own veto. Türkiye's counter-argument is that reform which creates more permanent privilege would widen, not narrow, the legitimacy gap.

Gaza and Palestine

Ankara uses the Council's record on Gaza as a case study. Between October 2023 and early 2024 the United States vetoed several draft resolutions calling for a ceasefire or humanitarian pause, and in March 2024 Russia and China vetoed a US draft; Resolution 2728, demanding a ceasefire for Ramadan, passed on 25 March 2024 with the US abstaining. Türkiye has called for an immediate ceasefire, unhindered humanitarian access and a two-state settlement based on the 1967 lines with East Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine, a position consistent with its 1988 recognition of Palestine. President Erdoğan has also offered Türkiye as a guarantor in any future arrangement and Ankara has announced it would join the case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice. Israel and the United States dispute aspects of these positions, and Israel rejects accusations of violating international law.

Africa and the Horn of Africa

Türkiye has been an observer to the African Union since 2005 and was declared a strategic partner in 2008. It has hosted or co-hosted partnership summits in 2008, 2014 and 2021 and expanded its diplomatic network across the continent. President Erdoğan's 2011 visit to Mogadishu during famine opened a long-term engagement in Somalia, covering aid, infrastructure and training. In December 2024, Türkiye mediated the “Ankara Declaration” between Somalia and Ethiopia over maritime access. Ankara frames Africa's absence from permanent Council seats as a prime example of why reform is needed.

The Gulf and the Organization of Turkic States

In the Gulf, Ankara cites its strategic dialogue with the Gulf Cooperation Council (since 2008), its security cooperation with Qatar and a 2023 leaders' tour of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE as evidence of a diversified diplomacy. In the Turkic world, the Turkic Council founded in 2009 became the Organization of Turkic States (OTS) in 2021, with Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Türkiye and Uzbekistan as members and Turkmenistan and Hungary as observers; the Turkish Cypriot State was granted observer status in 2022. Ankara presents the OTS as a model of regional cooperation within the UN framework, not an alternative to it.

Climate diplomacy: Zero Waste and COP31

The Zero Waste Initiative, launched in 2017 under the patronage of Emine Erdoğan, led to a UN High-Level Advisory Board on Zero Waste and to General Assembly resolution 77/161 (December 2022), which created the International Day of Zero Waste on 30 March. Türkiye ratified the Paris Agreement in October 2021 and announced a net-zero target for 2053. At COP30 in Belém in November 2025, parties accepted an arrangement under which Türkiye hosts COP31 in Antalya in November 2026 and holds the presidency, while Australia leads the negotiations track and a pre-COP is held in the Pacific. Ankara presents this as a practical contribution to a more inclusive global agenda. Critics point out that Türkiye's coal reliance and emissions growth will be scrutinized.

Source Comparison

Issue Common international framing Turkish primary-source framing
Slogan A rhetorical gesture by a government seeking more influence A principled critique of the veto, grounded in sovereign equality and backed by a UfC negotiating position (Presidency, UN speeches, MFA)
Permanent seats Expanding the club is the main route to credibility New permanent seats entrench privilege; more elected seats are fairer (MFA)
Gaza Vetoes and abstentions show Council divisions among the P5 Deadlock illustrates the structural flaw; Türkiye offers humanitarian diplomacy and guarantor proposals (Presidency, MFA)
Mediation Türkiye is a pragmatic broker with its own interests Mediation is evidence that middle powers can fill the gap left by a blocked Council (MFA)
Climate COP31 reflects a compromise within the UNFCCC process An opportunity to carry Zero Waste and inclusive multilateralism into the climate regime (Presidency)

Readers should compare these with the UN's own records, including Council verbatim records, the IGN documents and General Assembly resolutions. For how we treat sources, see Editorial Principles and Primary Source Standards; for tests of claims, see the Fact Check Hub.

  • P5: The five permanent members of the Security Council, each with veto power under Article 27(3).
  • Veto: A permanent member's negative vote that blocks a substantive Council decision.
  • IGN (Intergovernmental Negotiations): The General Assembly process on Council reform, running since 2009.
  • G4: Brazil, Germany, India and Japan, who seek permanent seats.
  • Uniting for Consensus (UfC): A group opposing new permanent seats; Türkiye is a member.
  • Ezulwini Consensus: The African Union's common position seeking two permanent and five non-permanent seats for Africa.
  • Zero Waste: The Türkiye-initiated programme that became a UN-recognized international day.

Related reading: About Hard Power Review: Mission, Transparency and Editorial Team, Cyprus: The 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, and The Montreux Convention and Türkiye's Mediation.

Published by the Hard Power Review Editorial Team.

Perspective Note: Hard Power Review presents Türkiye's official strategic perspective alongside its legal and historical reasoning, and we say so openly so that readers can weigh our analysis accordingly. Claims are attributed to primary sources wherever possible, including treaties, UN documents, official statements, Ottoman and other state archives, and open-source defense data.

Cross-Publication Dossiers & Sister Desk Perspectives

For complementary primary-source analysis across our specialist editorial network, consult:

Frequently asked questions

What does “The world is bigger than five” mean?

It is President Erdoğan's slogan (Dünya beşten büyüktür) criticizing a Security Council in which five permanent members hold a veto while 188 other UN members do not. It argues that global decisions should reflect the whole membership rather than the post-1945 order.

Does Türkiye want a permanent seat on the Security Council?

Türkiye's published position, as a member of Uniting for Consensus, opposes creating new permanent seats. It favours a larger Council with more elected members, longer terms and the possibility of re-election, and an overall more representative and accountable system.

How does Türkiye's plan differ from the G4 and African Union proposals?

The G4 (Brazil, Germany, India, Japan) seek new permanent seats for themselves, and the African Union seeks two permanent seats with veto rights for Africa. Türkiye and other UfC members reject new permanent categories and prefer an expanded elected tier.

Why is the Security Council so hard to reform?

Amending the UN Charter needs a two-thirds vote in the General Assembly and ratification by two-thirds of members, including all five permanent members. Since each of them can effectively block a change that reduces its privileges, and regional rivals disagree on who should be permanent, agreement has not been reached since the IGN began in 2009.

How do Gaza and COP31 connect to the reform argument?

Ankara cites Council deadlock over Gaza as evidence of the veto's costs and presents its humanitarian and mediation diplomacy as an alternative. COP31, which Türkiye is set to host in Antalya in November 2026, is presented as a chance to extend inclusive multilateralism, including the Zero Waste agenda, into climate policy.

Perspective & Editorial Transparency Note

Hard Power Review presents Türkiye's official strategic perspective alongside its legal and historical reasoning, and we say so openly so that readers can weigh our analysis accordingly. Claims are attributed to primary sources wherever possible, including treaties, UN documents, official statements, Ottoman and other state archives, and open-source defense data.

Author: Hard Power Review Editorial TeamAbout Hard Power Review →Editorial Principles →

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks